<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>insignificant thoughts - Latest Comments in Hey Google&amp;#8230;  SCREW YOU&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://insignificantthoughts.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://insignificantthoughts.disqus.com/hey_google8230_screw_you8230/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:05:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Hey Google&amp;#8230;  SCREW YOU&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2006/10/26/hey-google-screw-you/#comment-34213348</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is interesting, because up until recently, Google was firmly against the use of "google" as a verb -- regardless of context.  Now they're cool with it as long as one is actually referring to &lt;a href="http://google.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="google.com"&gt;google.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This sounds stupid, but it is a fairly common practice.  Johnson &amp;amp; Johnson gets annoyed when people use "Band-Aid" to refer to other brands of adhesive bandages, as does Kimberly Clark when facial tissues are referred to generically as "Kleenex".  The same applies to "Popsicles", "Q-Tips", "Jell-O", etc..  In fact, it is my understanding that corporations are required to enforce their trademarks, regardless of how stupid it might seem, because if they ignore some violations, other violators can point to these cases in court, and brand exclusivity can be lost.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's lame, but the American trademark system requires idiocy like this.  Google isn't the problem, the USPTO is.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">justis</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:05:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hey Google&amp;#8230;  SCREW YOU&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2006/10/26/hey-google-screw-you/#comment-34213347</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Stephanie, are you kidding? I don't think that the best way to protect your brand is to tell people (as a teacher to a 6 years old boy) you can say "google something" if you use Google Search Engine, but you cannot if you use another search engine (because their lawyers say "it's bad, bad, bad"). The first reaction to me was to "google something" using Yahoo!. Where is the "Don't be evil Company"? I think they've got too much money in their pockets in a too short timeslot: how will they be within the next 10 years?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gattox</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 06:23:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hey Google&amp;#8230;  SCREW YOU&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2006/10/26/hey-google-screw-you/#comment-34213346</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, give me a break.  They ARE a company, with a logo and a brand name.  It's only natural that they try to maintain their name as theirs.  They are a business, as much as some people don't want to admit it, and it's business as usual to protect their property, including their name.  They were nice and tried to be humourous about it, but made sure to make their point.  Stop being so arrogant yourself that you criticize them for asserting their name as a corporation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephanie</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 05:31:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hey Google&amp;#8230;  SCREW YOU&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2006/10/26/hey-google-screw-you/#comment-34213345</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Totally agree with you..Google should not even start wasting their efforts policing the use of their name in the English language..If I say "I googled myself yesterday", I am supposed to shudder in guilt and lawsuit-driven fear? (For using the word "google", not for googling myself, hehehe)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Google is a great and admirable company but this post in the blog smirked of arrogance and pompousness.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The.HanyeâˆšÂ©</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 04:58:56 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>