<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>insignificant thoughts - Latest Comments in Common-sense software licensing&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://insignificantthoughts.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://insignificantthoughts.disqus.com/common_sense_software_licensing8230/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:03:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Common-sense software licensing&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://insignificantthoughts.com/2007/02/14/common-sense-software-licensing/#comment-34213870</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's nice that a company is explicitly stating with other companies have been doing for years.  The truth is that while software licensing is still limited in some fashions, most licenses purchased by end users are done with a single-concurrent use model.  This means that yes, you as an individual can have two+ copies of any product INSTALLED on any/all of your computers at the same time.  But you can only use one at any given moment in time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How many instances of Word do you need running on how many different devices you have?  :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;~Jeff&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeff Gordon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:03:57 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>